This is the campus ledger, the forty largest announced datacenter campuses on the record at the end of August 2026. They were chosen by their announced size where a figure exists and by their standing in the record where none does.
From The AI Compute Race. Read the book
The rows do not move after that reading; a date reported later is noted on this page, not in the book.
The ledger sets what the forty largest announced datacenter campuses promised against what the public record evidences. Together the twenty-six come to 38.4 gigawatts announced or estimated, against 4.8 gigawatts evidenced across all forty, read at the end of August 2026 and kept at that date; the ledger is re-read at the close of the record, 1 November 2026. The rule of evidence: A megawatt counts as evidenced when a primary document shows it energized or when Epoch AI’s site-level estimate counts it as operating IT capacity, and never when the builder says so. Epoch’s site-level estimates, which are of operating IT capacity and not of a metered draw, are also nearly all of the evidenced side.
Promised Against Energized
announced or estimated IT evidenced, end of August 2026 · MW
Totals
- 12.4%of announced or estimated IT evidenced, end of August 20264,770 MW of 38,350 MW, on the 26 campuses with both figures; left out, with no announced figure: Nebius Vineland 50 MW
- 38,350 MWAnnounced or estimated ITover the 26 campuses that state a figure; 14 not on file
16 Never dated14 Not yet due4 Slipped2 Kept1 Missed1 Missed, if ‘early 2026’ meant the first quarter (the book counts it as a miss)1 Due, not evidenced1 Transferred
Every party, with its own page
The promises, by the date each was due
Kept Slipped Missed Not yet due Due, not evidenced Transferred · 24 of 40 campuses carry a promised date
- Colossus 1: promised 2024-07-31, Kept
- Stargate Abilene: promised 2025-06-30, Slipped
- Nebius Vineland: promised 2025-06-30, Slipped
- Colossus 2: promised 2026-01-17, Slipped
- Fairwater Wisconsin: promised 2026-03-31, Missed, if ‘early 2026’ meant the first quarter (the book counts it as a miss)
- Helios: promised 2026-06-30, Slipped
- HUMAIN Saudi AI-factory program: promised 2026-06-30, Due, not evidenced
- Scala AI City: promised 2026-09-11, Missed
- Stargate Doña Ana / Project Jupiter: promised 2026-12-31, Not yet due
- Stargate Shackelford / Frontier: promised 2026-12-31, Not yet due
- Stargate UAE: promised 2026-12-31, Not yet due
- Stargate Milam County: promised 2026-12-31, Not yet due
- Prometheus: promised 2026-12-31, Kept
- Stargate Norway: promised 2026-12-31, Transferred
- Stargate Lordstown: promised 2026-12-31, Not yet due
- Project Matador / HyperGrid: promised 2026-12-31, Not yet due
- ByteDance (TikTok) Pecém: promised 2027-01-31, Not yet due
- AWS Northern Indiana program: promised 2027-01-31, Not yet due
- Jinko Zhongwei: promised 2027-12-31, Not yet due
- PORTS-Pike: promised 2028-12-31, Not yet due
- Paducah AI/HPC campus: promised 2028-12-31, Not yet due
- Stargate Port Washington / Lighthouse: promised 2028-12-31, Not yet due
- Project Camellia: promised 2028-12-31, Not yet due
- Hyperion: promised 2030-12-31, Not yet due
How the ledger is counted, in the book’s words
This is the campus ledger, the forty largest announced datacenter campuses on the record at the end of August 2026. They were chosen by their announced size where a figure exists and by their standing in the record where none does, which is why a program sized in the press at twenty megawatts and fourteen campuses with no defensible figure stand among them. It is this book’s own reconstruction, graded D in the Scorecard, and every figure in it carries a source and a date on its companion page. Each row sets the IT load announced for the campus, the computing load as distinct from the power the site draws, against the IT load the public record evidenced at the end of August 2026. Each row also gives the state of the builder’s dated promise. A megawatt counts as evidenced when a primary document shows it energized or when Epoch AI’s site-level estimate counts it as operating IT capacity, and never when the builder says so. Epoch’s estimate is of capacity installed rather than of power metered, so the evidenced column can run ahead of the load actually drawn, never behind it. Where a builder has published a figure the row takes the builder’s. Where none has, the row takes Epoch’s estimate of the campus as built or planned, marked E, which for a campus not yet built is Epoch’s figure for its planned end state. Where neither a primary document nor Epoch supports a figure, the cell says no defensible figure.
Announced against energized, the ledger shows a gap of eight to one. Twenty-six of the forty carry a figure: thirteen the builder’s or a press report’s, 24.8 gigawatts together, and thirteen Epoch’s estimate, 13.6 gigawatts together, Doña Ana’s 1,750 megawatts among them as Epoch’s figure for the end of 2028. Together the twenty-six come to 38.4 gigawatts announced or estimated, against 4.8 gigawatts evidenced across all forty. Two campuses in Inner Mongolia are partly operating, one of them with a first-phase figure on the company’s word only, so the 4.8 is a floor. The gap is widest where the figure is the builder’s own. The thirteen campuses with a builder’s or a press figure have 133 megawatts evidenced between them, all of it at Helios in Dickens County, Texas, and twelve of the thirteen have none. The thirteen Epoch sizes have 4.64 gigawatts, about three gigawatts estimated for each one evidenced. On the twenty-six campuses with both figures the evidenced load is 4.77 gigawatts, the fifty megawatts at Nebius’s Vineland campus, which has no defensible announced figure, standing outside them. Of the 4.8 gigawatts evidenced, 2.0 sit on three campuses that never dated a phase, Amazon’s Rainier at New Carlisle, Microsoft’s Fairwater Atlanta and Google’s New Albany, so two-fifths of the energized load lies outside the promise test altogether.
Each row’s promise is the builder’s own dated phase, a date the builder gave in its own words for a stated phase, as the record held it at the end of August 2026. The rows do not move after that reading, and a date reported later is noted on the companion page, not here. Never dated means no such phase. Not yet due means a dated phase whose day had not come. Kept means a dated phase evidenced by its day. Slipped means a dated phase whose day passed with the phase evidenced late or only in part. Missed means a day passed with nothing evidenced. Due, not evidenced, means a day passed with no record either way. Transferred means a promise whose capacity passed to another party. Counted so, sixteen never dated a phase, fifteen had a dated phase not yet due, four slipped, two kept their dates, one came due without evidence and one was transferred. One, Microsoft’s Fairwater Wisconsin, is missed if its “early 2026” means the first quarter, since the campus went live in mid-April; it is counted here as a miss, as chapter 12 counts it. Scala’s first stage, due on 11 September 2026, was not yet due at the reading and has been missed since.
Three things do not date a row. A target reported on unnamed people’s word does not. Bloomberg’s of 30 July 2026 for DeepSeek’s Ulanqab campus, that the company was pushing to bring at least part of the capacity online by the end of 2027 or early 2028, is one. A utility’s filed load schedule does not, since it is the customer’s contract with its utility, as Michigan’s utility regulator approved for Oracle’s Green Chile Ventures at Saline Township on 18 December 2025. A date reported after the reading does not. The ABC’s of 16 September 2026, naming no source, that Anthropic, tenant of part of Western Downs, aims to start using the center in 2027, is one.
Chapter 12 scores the promises on a second list, the slippage matrix, thirty-one dated deadlines that overlap these forty, and where both lists hold a campus the matrix’s reading governs. Two rows differ from it here. Colossus 2 is slipped on this ledger, which reads the campus, and missed on both its steps on the matrix, which reads the phases; Scala’s miss the matrix dates to 11 September. On the ledger’s own list nine dated promises have come due: two kept, four slipped, one missed on the reading of “early,” one due without evidence, and Scala’s since the reading. Chapter 12’s test asks for three in four kept by 31 December 2027, on the matrix, and nine promises, five of them one builder’s, are too few to convict a cohort of forty. The full ledger, every column with its source and its date, and a page for each campus, is at dryburgh.com/vol1/ledger. What the ledger shows is the gap: forty campuses announced or estimated at thirty-eight gigawatts and evidenced at under five.
From the book’s backmatter.
The 40 campuses
Each campus opens to its own page: the promise, its source and date, and the evidence with its date.
| # | Campus | Location | Announced or estimated (MW) | Announced source date | Evidenced, end of August 2026 (MW) | Evidence date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PORTS-Pike | Pike County, Ohio, US | 8,000 | 0 | Not yet due | ||
| 2 | Hyperion | Richland Parish, Louisiana, US | 5,000 | 0 | Not yet due | ||
| 3 | Scala AI City | Eldorado do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil | 4,750 | 0 | Missed | ||
| 4 | Fairwater Wisconsin | Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, US | 2,263 | 369 | Missed, if ‘early 2026’ meant the first quarter (the book counts it as a miss) | ||
| 5 | Rainier / New Carlisle | New Carlisle, Indiana, US | 1,925 | 910 | Never dated | ||
| 6 | Stargate Doña Ana / Project Jupiter | Doña Ana County, New Mexico, US | 1,750 | 0 | Not yet due | ||
| 7 | Colossus 2 | Memphis, Tennessee, and Southaven, Mississippi, US | 1,531 | 946 | Slipped | ||
| 8 | Stargate Shackelford / Frontier | Shackelford County, Texas, US | 1,400 | 0 | Not yet due | ||
| 9 | Paducah AI/HPC campus | Paducah DOE reservation, Kentucky, US | 1,200 | 0 | Not yet due | ||
| 10 | Stargate UAE | Abu Dhabi, UAE | 1,000 | 0 | Not yet due | ||
| 11 | Google Visakhapatnam AI hub | Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India | 1,000 | 0 | Never dated | ||
| 12 | Jinko Zhongwei | Zhongwei, Ningxia, China | 1,000 | 0 | Not yet due | ||
| 13 | Stargate Michigan / The Barn | Saline Township, Michigan, US | 988 | 0 | Never dated | ||
| 14 | Stargate Port Washington / Lighthouse | Port Washington, Wisconsin, US | 902 | 0 | Not yet due | ||
| 15 | Stargate Milam County | Milam County, Texas, US | 857 | 0 | Not yet due | ||
| 16 | Prometheus | New Albany, Ohio, US | 854 | 562 | Kept | ||
| 17 | Stargate Abilene | Abilene, Texas, US | 843 | 421 | Slipped | ||
| 18 | Fairwater Atlanta | Fayetteville, Georgia, US | 636 | 636 | Never dated | ||
| 19 | Helios | Dickens County, Texas, US | 526 | 133 | Slipped | ||
| 20 | HUMAIN Saudi AI-factory program | Riyadh and Dammam, Saudi Arabia | 500 | 0 | Due, not evidenced | ||
| 21 | Google New Albany | New Albany, Ohio, US | 453 | 453 | Never dated | ||
| 22 | Colossus 1 | Memphis, Tennessee, US | 340 | 340 | Kept | ||
| 23 | Stargate Norway | Kvandal, Narvik, Norway | 230 | 0 | Transferred | ||
| 24 | Stargate Lordstown | Lordstown, Ohio, US | 214 | 0 | Not yet due | ||
| 25 | ByteDance (TikTok) Pecém | Pecém, Ceará, Brazil | not on file | 0 | Not yet due | ||
| 26 | Reliance–Meta Jamnagar | Jamnagar, Gujarat, India | 168 | 0 | Never dated | ||
| 27 | Stargate Korea (two sites) | South Korea (sites not verified) | 20 | 0 | Never dated | ||
| 28 | Project Matador / HyperGrid | Amarillo (Carson County), Texas, US | not on file | 0 | Not yet due | ||
| 29 | Project Camellia | Effingham County, Georgia, US | not on file | 0 | Not yet due | ||
| 30 | AWS Northern Indiana program | Northern Indiana, US | not on file | 0 | Not yet due | ||
| 31 | Western Downs Digital Park | Kogan and Dalby, Queensland, Australia | not on file | 0 | Never dated | ||
| 32 | Envision Galaxy Campus | Ulanqab, Inner Mongolia, China | not on file | not on file | Never dated | ||
| 33 | IREN Sweetwater | Sweetwater County, Texas, US (as the August 2026 compilation gives it) | not on file | 0 | Never dated | ||
| 34 | Reliance Digital Connexion Visakhapatnam | Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India | not on file | 0 | Never dated | ||
| 35 | GDS Ulanqab program | Ulanqab, Inner Mongolia, China | not on file | 0 | Never dated | ||
| 36 | DeepSeek Ulanqab | Ulanqab, Inner Mongolia, China | not on file | 0 | Never dated | ||
| 37 | Z.ai domestic-chip campus | China (location not public) | not on file | not on file | Never dated | ||
| 38 | Nebius Vineland | Vineland, New Jersey, US | not on file | 50 | Slipped | ||
| 39 | Stargate UK | Cobalt Park and prospective UK sites | not on file | 0 | Never dated | ||
| 40 | Stargate Argentina | Argentina (site not selected) | not on file | 0 | Never dated |
Questions
What does the ledger count?
The forty largest announced datacenter campuses on the record at the end of August 2026. Each row sets the campus’s announced IT load, the computing load rather than the power the site draws, against the IT load the public record had evidenced by that date. Twenty-six of the forty carry an announced figure: thirteen from the builder or a press report, 24.8 gigawatts together, and thirteen from Epoch AI’s estimates, 13.6 gigawatts together.
What counts as evidenced capacity?
The rule is chapter 12’s: a megawatt counts as evidenced when a primary document shows it energized, or when Epoch AI’s site-level estimate counts it as operating IT capacity, and never on the builder’s say-so. Epoch’s estimates are of operating IT capacity, not of a metered draw, and they make up nearly all of the evidenced side.
How much of the announced capacity is evidenced?
The twenty-six campuses with a figure come to 38.4 gigawatts announced or estimated; across all forty, 4.8 gigawatts were evidenced, a floor, since two campuses in Inner Mongolia are partly operating with no published figure. That is about one megawatt in eight, read at the end of August 2026 and kept at that date; the ledger is re-read at the close of the record, 1 November 2026.
Why is so little of the announced capacity evidenced?
Most of the promises were never dated or are not yet due. Of the forty, sixteen never dated a phase, fifteen had a dated phase not yet due, four slipped, two kept their dates, one came due without evidence, and one was transferred to another party.
What does “no defensible figure” mean in the ledger?
No source gives an IT load for that campus that the ledger can defend: what the developers published is a power, grid or facility figure, or a number nobody has verified. Where neither a primary document nor Epoch supports a figure, the cell says no defensible figure.
The 40 campuses as data: CSV · JSON
How to cite this page
Dryburgh, Lee S. “The forty-campus ledger.” In The AI Compute Race. DRYBURGH. https://dryburgh.com/vol1/ledger (accessed 2026-11-01).
BibTeX
@misc{dryburgh-the-forty-campus-ledger-2026,
author = {Dryburgh, Lee S.},
title = {{The forty-campus ledger}},
howpublished = {In \emph{The AI Compute Race}, DRYBURGH},
year = {2026},
url = {https://dryburgh.com/vol1/ledger},
note = {Accessed 2026-11-01}
}