Dr. Palevsky is a NYS licensed pediatrician, who utilizes a holistic approach to children’s wellness and illness. Dr. Palevsky received his medical degree from the NYU School of Medicine in 1987, completed a three-year pediatric residency at The Mount Sinai Hospital in NYC in 1990, and served as a pediatric fellow in the ambulatory care out-patient department at Bellevue Hospital, NYC, from 1990-1991. Since 1991, his clinical experience includes working in pediatric emergency and intensive care medicine, in-patient, and out-patient pediatric medicine, neonatal intensive care medicine, newborn and delivery room medicine, and conventional, holistic and integrative pediatric private practice. Dr. Palevsky is a diplomate of the American Board of Integrative Holistic Medicine, and Past–President of the American Holistic Medical Association. He received his pediatric board certification in 1990, and passed his pediatric board recertification exams in 1997, 2004, and 2011.
In his current pediatric practice, Dr. Palevsky offers well-child examinations, consultations and educational programs to families and practitioners in the areas of preventive and holistic health; childhood development; lifestyle changes; nutrition for adults, infants and children; safe, alternative treatments for common and difficult to treat acute and chronic pediatric and adult conditions; vaccination controversies; mindful parenting; and rethinking the medical paradigm.
The original interview is 85 minutes. I reduced it to 21 minutes. I don’t think I lost anything.
Transcript of Clips
Each separate clip transcribed and time-stamped below.
Larry Palevsky ➝ 00:00
Oh, it’s a vaccine. Therefore it is the savior. It is going to protect us. I will be healthier with an injection of this material and we collectively will be healthier.
And yet the technology that’s being used has never been used before. And so we’re not dealing with the same material that we see in all the other vaccines we’ve had up to date.
And so most vaccines when they’re studied are studied 7 to 10 years, and they’re studied and they’re surveyed and they’re watched, and people are watched for years. But somehow this material, which has never been used, is now being passed through after maybe 8 to 10 months of exploration.
And that should make us question, well, do we really know if it’s a vaccine and do we really know, is it going to actually stop us from getting SARS-CoV-2 infection because it’s a new technology.
How do we know it’s actually going to protect us against this infection? If it is going to protect us against this infection, do we have enough information to understand whether it will stop the transmission of the infection?
We certainly haven’t been studying long enough to actually know if transmission will slow down or even be halted. Will it prevent death? Will it prevent hospitalization? Will it prevent severe symptoms of Covid-19? And so far all of the information we have indicates that it may reduce mild to moderate symptoms of the infection.
And so we don’t know, we don’t know. It also supposed to create this new technology that makes our own bodies manufacture antibodies against a portion of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It’s called the spike protein and this mRNA or messenger RNA vaccine – has again, never been used before in human vaccines.
We don’t know if it’s actually going to alter our own genetic codes. And certainly the vaccine has not been tested to see if it will cause cancer, if it will cause mutations of our genes, if it will cause any problems on the fetus, if women are pregnant, will it actually lead to miscarriages if women who are pregnant, get the vaccine. And there’s some concern coming out of the European literature about the possibility that this vaccine may actually make people infertile and cause miscarriages during vaccines.
December 19, 2020
“We don’t know if it’s actually going to alter our own genetic codes.
And certainly the vaccine has not been tested to see if it will cause cancer, if it will cause mutations of our genes, if it will cause any problems on the fetus, if women are pregnant, will it actually lead to miscarriages if women who are pregnant”
So we have a lot of information about this vaccine that’s unknown. My concern also is that the vaccine manufacturers, the main ones right now, which are Pfizer and Moderna, seem to be hiding information about people dying in the trials and people having severe health outcomes from the vaccine.
That information is being hidden. One of the things that’s always important when we give a vaccine is to understand whether the material we’re injecting is going to create the possibility of an auto-immune disease or an auto-immune reaction. And some of the data coming out in Europe actually suggests the possibility that the genetic material from the spike protein is very similar to genetic material in the body.
The spike protein is the mRNA, right?
Correct. The mRNA is the messenger RNA, that codes for the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. And what’s interesting is that there’s some evidence that this…
And that has never been in a vaccine ever before?
We have never used this technology to administer vaccines to humans before.
Now what’s interesting is that any attempt to utilize this mRNA technology in animals has led to disastrous health outcomes of the animals, including many of whom who died.
And when this vaccine was started for trial in humans in 2020, the experts decided that we didn’t need to revisit utilizing this vaccine in experiments with animals, that we could go straight to humans and just start the trials with humans.
But the concern about the auto-immunity, I just want to tease it out a little bit, is that if you inject material into the body, that is meant to create an antibody as part of the measure of effectiveness of a vaccine, that antibody is going to always attack whatever description it’s been told to attack.
December 19, 2020
“Now what’s interesting is that any attempt to utilize this mRNA technology in animals has led to disastrous health outcomes of the animals, including many of whom who died.”
And if your body contains the same or similar genetic material to what you’ve been injected with, your immune system is going to be primed to attack you as well. And so we have some evidence that the genetic code of the spike protein is similar to pieces of our own genetic code, which then increases the potential for auto-immunity.
And there’s no way you would know this in just 8 to 10 months of trial. You would just automatically assume because you’re devoted to vaccines and vaccines are going to save us. You would bypass that in a cognitive dissonant way and not allow that information to bathe your nervous system because you couldn’t possibly fathom that they would produce a vaccine that may harm us. That may hurt us. That may kill us. That may make us infertile, that may make pregnant women lose babies, and that may create auto-immunity.
Now what’s interesting to me also is that the vaccine itself needs to be stored at very, very cold temperatures.
Is that normal for a vaccine?
No, no. I mean, minus a hundred degrees Fahrenheit, minus 80 degrees Celsius. I mean, this is the kind of storage that we’re talking about, and here’s why. The experts are saying that the messenger RNA is very unstable and when it gets into the cells, it might be destroyed very easily, but they have mastered a protector around the messenger RNA called polyethylene glycol, PEG.
And PEG isolates the mRNA in an encased globule, in an encased particle so that it won’t be automatically broken down into the cytoplasm. But we have no idea what happens to that mRNA or to the polyethylene glycol once it’s injected into the body, because we haven’t really examined the question.
Well, what happens to the mRNA when it’s injected into the body? Does it, because it’s covered by this PEG, make its way all the way into the nucleus to actually embed into our own genes? And does it change our own genes? Cause that’s some of the concern that it creates. It’s actually genetic engineering and you’ll hear experts who say, absolutely not. The mRNA doesn’t get into the nucleus. But that’s in absolute terms.
But with the PEG, we don’t know. Does it actually travel into the nucleus where it might embed into the genetic code? Now, the other thing that’s important about this vaccine is that there are nanoparticles that are surrounding the mRNA.
Nanoparticles are just that – nano, very tiny, particles. And the concern about nanoparticles, and I think everybody should be concerned about nanoparticles, is that they can go anywhere in the body, including the brain because nanoparticles are capable of passing through cell membranes, the way a ghost would be able to pass through a wall.
And so even if there’s a bouncer at the cell membrane, the nanoparticles can bypass the bouncer and just go into the cells without any restriction. And so is this nanoparticle material going to get into the brain? And if it is such a strong nanoparticle, can it go all the way into the nucleus of the cell?
Larry Palevsky ➝ 10:22
And use caution, use the precautionary principle, especially knowing that the recovery rate from this illness is greater than 99%. And yes, there are people who know people who died of this illness, but I am afraid, based on the lack of knowledge that we have and the developing knowledge that we have, that the recovery rate from this vaccine won’t be nearly as high as the recovery rate from the illness itself.
One last thing. The only reason that this vaccine could get pushed through the way it is, is because of something in the United States called the emergency use authorization, EUA. And the only way that you can pass through a vaccine like this without proper federal approval and without proper scientific studies is if the medical system can show that there is no other alternative.
December 19, 2020
“but I am afraid, based on the lack of knowledge that we have and the developing knowledge that we have, that the recovery rate from this vaccine won’t be nearly as high as the recovery rate from the illness itself.”
In other words, there’s nothing that could treat this illness or to help people prevent this illness other than a vaccine. And there are hundreds, if not thousands of medical doctors in the United States and around the world who have legitimate, real time clinical experience of using medications orally and through nebulizer and supplements and nutraceuticals and homeopathy and herbs to successfully recover patients who never even needed hospitalizations.
And all of the authorities around the world have decided to censor that information as if the experiences of these doctors and the experiences of these patients are not real. And that should raise a little bit of an alarm and say, well, wait a second.
If doctors have a way to prevent it and a way to treat it, why would we need an emergency use authorization to push this vaccine through in a way that’s unprecedented, that really has not been effectively studied and does raise a number of scientific alarms hope.
Larry Palevsky ➝ 13:06
I’d like to revisit something that you said, Damian, because, I sort of started to mention it in the beginning. And now I know that there are people who are listening, who will listen to this, who struggle with the word vaccine in their system. And there is this devotion, like, of course this is going to save us. Of course this is going to be what we need. How else are we going to stop the spread?
We’re not vaccinating just for ourselves. We’re vaccinating for those around us. When the vaccine hasn’t even been shown or proven to stop the existence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus at all.
And certainly, as I said before, it hasn’t been shown to stop the transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. And so it really requires digging in and staying present and being okay with the discomfort of the fact that how could this be?
And if you don’t believe me, I will tell you that this information is readily available in there are lots of questions around this information that are coming out from doctors all over the world. And it’s just a matter of being able to sit there and go, how could this be? How could this be? Because I don’t know if you going back to work is actually going to be the same person.
So if you have to get this vaccine, we may be in a state of the world where we might have to change jobs. We might have to get our kids out of school.
We might have to move. I mean, we are essentially, and Lori, I’m going to toss this back over to you in a second. We are essentially at war in the world, whether we like it or not. We may not have the typical tanks and bombs being dropped, but figuratively, I think this is a war and we may have to make decisions that are made because we’re able to draw a line in the sand because of our sovereignty, because of our individual freedoms and because of our empowerment and because of our taking back our authority and realizing that not only is it very possible that the authorities are not having our best interest around this vaccine, but you’re going to pick up a rock that might show you that there’s a long history and perhaps decades of the authorities not necessarily having our best interest at heart.
And so, again, not to scare, but to really realize that some of us may be in a stupor and maybe slumbered because it’s next to impossible for us to connect to another possibility other than vaccine equals savior equals “I can go back to my life normally”.
I mean, there are people in the powers around the world who are saying, “Oh, no, you won’t go back to normal even after you get the vaccine, you’re still going to have to wear a mask. And we might still be in lockdown to 2022.”
And so I don’t, again, don’t want to scare you, but this is much more than just saving us from an illness that we can see over 99% recovery from, especially if we start implementing the supplements and the medications that can prevent the illness and prevent death from the illness, if somebody gets it.
Larry Palevsky ➝ 17:11
And it certainly has the potential to create auto-immunity and even something else called antibody induced enhancement, whereby if you do get vaccinated and you do get exposed to the virus, you actually develop a worse illness than if you had the actual SARS-CoV-2 illness in the first place.
So we’re hiding a lot of science and a lot of truth.
And, you know, we have limited time to really go through. I mean, as you’re talking and as Lori’s talking, I keep remembering, “Oh, another thing about the vaccine that I want to tell you. Oh, another thing about the vaccine that I want to tell you”, and we could keep going for a long time, because there is enough concern.
Larry Palevsky ➝ 18:02
Yes, there is some record that these vaccines have been grown on aborted, fetal cells. Nothing of that is so far seeing that I can tell in the package insert here. But it’s well established that there are scientists who have asked them to give them a full list of the ingredients and they have refused it.
Larry Palevsky ➝ 18:30
If you have the measles infection as a child, nobody would ever recommend that you get the measles vaccine. If you had the chicken pox illness as a child, nobody would ever recommend that you get the chicken pox vaccine. But this vaccine is meant to be given to everybody, whether you’ve had the illness or have been exposed or not, and that’s not practicing medicine, right?
So again, there are all these steps of, huh? How did, how, what? Because these are not known scientific and medical standards that are being followed.
All of a sudden we are turning science and medicine around to suit a narrative.
And so when you ask, why are we pushing this new technology? That’s a good question to ask, and I’m not sure if we’re going to get the real dark answer, unless we’re able to go to that dark place, because it’s never been tested to see if it alters the genes, but you know, again, you have these experts saying, no, no, no, no, no. It’s not going to get into the genetic code. It’s only going to stay in the cell itself. Yeah.
But maybe with the amount of particles, it will get into the genes. So again, none of this has been looked at. We’re actually throwing this material into the public without any proof that it works.
And I go back to my original statement. As soon as people hear the word vaccine, every bit of logic turns off. Every bit of inquiry, every bit of scientific discussion, every bit of interest in really working it through and seeing is this something that’s really safe?
Is this something that’s really been proven? Is this something that’s really going to show the kind of responses that we need? Have we watched the evaluation of this vaccine long enough? Have the studies actually been showing that more people are badly injured than we’re being told? Why would they be censoring that?
Why is this disease so recoverable and yet we’re shoving this material into everybody? And restricting their airplane movement, their travel movement, their driver’s license movement, their work movement, their school movement.
What is really going on here? I mean, we’ve never had this kind of strong arming and removal of discussion, at least in our lifetime in the Western world.
- James Lyons-Weiler — Pathogenic Priming: Coronavirus Vaccine Safety Warning
- Dr Yeadon’s (former Pfizer VP) Coronavirus Vaccine Safety Petition
- John P.A. Ioannidis — Coronavirus Health Policies Lacked Evidence, Politics Subverted Science
Source: ‘Examining The C-19 Vaccine: Lorie Ladd, Dr. Larry Palevsky & Damien Wynne’, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ge1q5XQv-4 (Copyright Lorie Ladd, December 19, 2020)